After my review of Peter Weiss' "aesthetics of resistance" on the occasion of his 25th Anniversary of the death in CEE IEH at the laziness of the reviewer failed, I have now decided to re-launch and will probably always wanted to set theses of the book to make some preliminary ideas for discussion:
The narrator repeatedly reflected on the difficulty of a resistor to him in understanding the totality of circumstances is justified - which has the aftertaste, unwanted apologetics of the impossibility of resistance in the 3rd operate kingdom. Practice (who want to understand the protagonist as a communist) is always associated with the reductionism that can not grasp the whole, respectively. a sense of imprisonment in the wrong sense to have. (P. 113f .*). This false Consciousness constitutes itself twice: first from the difficulty, if not impossible, to take out of their social class that can do what they theoretically led to resistance "work off" (p. 107 *). Second, from the perspective of the inherent 3.Reich, which allowed real, critical knowledge at all, but only in an idea of the "feeling that what [they] were doing the right thing" (p. 116 *) must remain under arrest. The tension between theory and practice, the protagonists too often stagnant. The "filter" which they think about their "senses" (p. 113 *), they can still recognize its existence, However, depending on your view beat, or apparently do not appear. And it is those "filters" this constituted double, false consciousness.
* The page numbers refer to the paperback edition of all three volumes from 2005
0 comments:
Post a Comment