Proraso Shaving Cream What Stores Sell

Moadon hakvarot cooperation

I can see me yesterday to the wonderful documentary "The Cemetery Club". A very successful evening amusement, except for an unconscious Palestinian scarf-wearer in the front row, with whom I worked for a while in thought, because I did not want to admit it, being able to enjoy the film.

Every Saturday morning, meet in Jerusalem, a group of older people to the Mount Herzl, who is also Israel's national cemetery and park to hold its meetings Mount Herzl Academy . They debate, read their own poems and famous, singing, and top it off with a meal at the end. This club even has its own statute, which identifies as the first item and purpose, together to discuss the Altersvereinsamung counter. The second article states that meetings take place with changing membership continues. These two meet in the reading of the statute to be contested and it is to out the words "to counteract the Altersvereinsamung "and the entire second calls. - It is clear to put that behind this demand, the shame, and a necessary denial of reality, the full tragedy that lies in this Constitution and its first two chapters, with the progress of the film, the period . and shooting lasted for five years, more evident towards the end once a revised version of the statute is read, which again included in the lifting of certain passages -. and in memory of the just seen now appear as unverzichbar

The Most reviewers write inside of it, as they had taken it, the protagonists as Holocaust survivors observed in the wild to be allowed - and they represent the intention of the director to the head. The film documents well the apparent indifference of people in old age - their regression to childish behavior, their seemingly neurotic quirks, strange-acting bleating, and everything that says what we know about older people. When the protagonists of their experiences in third Reich report, they do so without much emotion (except for a shot of one of the survivors for the first time returning to her village in Poland). In one scene, argues in the Kantian imperative and whether this claim despite Hitler and Nazi Germany remains valid could be very clear that this discussion would take place anywhere. As one of the protagonists, Lena, her niece (the director) talks about her deportation from the Warsaw ghetto to Auschwitz, you realize it the rational incomprehensibility of these experiences that are not emotional. There are no tears in your eyes to see. Your voice is all the time about everything but trembling, even very decisive. She seems to pontificate. The emotional implications, trauma, all 'that provide what many reviewers in the heart of their approach is not going to - it's buried deep in the protagonists. One can hardly imagine. You can worry about how such a thing possible, the presentation and the ever-present background force one of these thoughts even, but there is not using one of the film at hand.